Sunday, April 28, 2013

The issue of low truck speeds in India

It is very well known that the average speed of trucks in India is only around 20 kmph. There are estimates of a loss of Rs. 60,000 crores because of this. The Global average speed is said to be 60 - 80 kmph. These numbers point to a significant cost reduction opportunity in logistics.

The toll plazas, checking points and the poor road conditions are the familiar culprits for this ailment of low speed. Firms have been pointing fingers at the government and are painting a picture of them being in a helpless position. However the frequent truck breakdowns, vehicle overloading and poor driving discipline are also major causes of this low speed. These factors can easily be regulated and are in complete control of the firms. 

A two lane road (with one lane for each side) with all vehicles moving in an exact straight line can easily have vehicles travel at a very high inform speed. There are many assumptions in this statement however. The first assumption is that all vehicles are moving at a uniform speed. Because of over loading and also poorly maintained vehicles the speed of a very few vehicles is at around 20 kmph. Especially in cases of two lane highways such vehicles can easily slow down all the other vehicles. Given that only about 14% of the national highways have 4 or more than 4 lanes, this problem affects more than 85% of the Indian National highways.

In most cases the truck drivers are also least likely to follow the discipline of lanes. For four lane roads (with two lanes for each side), if all the slow vehicles could drive in one lane, the other lane could accommodate fast moving vehicles. Because the truck drivers choose to use the lanes that they deem fit at the spur of the moment, the entire highway network is slowed down.

Frequent breakdowns are also a major cause in slowing down the vehicle movements. For various reasons we have had poor maintenance management in professional as well as the owner driven vehicles. The high average age of vehicles (debated to be around 12 - 15 years) is also partly to be blamed for the high rate of break downs. Like the issue of a slow moving vehicle mentioned above, a vehicle breakdown would also cause a reduction in speed for all traffic on that route.

The altruistic answer to this problem would be for all firms to pay attention to vehicle maintenance and driver training and also ensure that all instances of overloading are avoided.  Easier said than done. Low margins in business are forcing logistics firms to minimise the immediate expenses on maintenance also to resort to over loading and such tactics. It would seem that any firm that stays 'honest' would obviously not be able to survive. The honesty and survival issue are topics for another blog.

The main point here is to get the industry to work on the same set of rules that minimise road disruptions and thus lead to high overall speeds. Such industry wide change can only come by forcing the application of the relevant laws in earnest. Instead of lobbying for easier rules, Organised firms should in fact push for strong rules and strict application. Given their expenses, it would be close to impossible for single truck owners to survive without overloading. Such changes would easily throw the unorganised players out of business and allow the organised players to expand their business footprint. That such strict rule implementation could also improve vehicle speed and thus profits would of course be an extra added advantage 
 


2 comments:

Talkative said...

A few more factors that reduce speed of vehicles:
1. Non availability of return load. This factor is particularly rampant in the Eastern region. Vehicles often have to wait 3-4 days to get a return load or travel as far as Vizag from Kolkata/ Guwahati without load in order to get a load. This overall reduces the average vehicle speed.


2. A bit more far stretched in the Indian context but the non existance of route planning (from vehicle routing perspective) is also responsible for the low average speed. In today's context companies deal with transporters most of whom (barring a very few)rent out vehicles from individual vehicle owners (60-80% of the fleet is usually rented from vehicle owners having 2-3 trucks on an average) on a point to point basis especially if the origin - destination is not a trunk route. How that vehicle is going to travel onwards from the destination is often not planned by the transporter renting the vehicle. Identification of another transporter/ load from the destination proves difficult and time consuming for the vehicle owner.

3. Non availability of shift drivers: Other than a very few big transporters, the concept of changing drivers on route is not popular in long haul routes. There are a few cases where two drivers accompany a vehicle but even that model requires halt of 3-4 hours a day and escalates the cost structure. If a single deriver is accompanying the vehicle it reduces the average speed by at least 35%

SiD said...

Nice Article Sir!

The reasons for low speeds that ones you and "Talkative" mentioned are spot on.

And the idea of Organized companies coming together to enforce laws for prevention of overloading is an interesting one as in many cases they are "forced" to overload due to the competition.

A push towards high share of organized players also helps in increasing their power vis-a-vis their clients. This can also lead to increase in their margins which in turn can lead to host of other changes like focus on maintenance, training and eventually higher speed.